Homily: “O God, be merciful to me, a sinner”

Thirtieth Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year C (go to readings)
Sirach 35:12-14, 16-18
Psalm 34:2-3, 17-18, 19, 23
2 Timothy 4:6-8, 16-18
Luke 18:9-14


Who were the Pharisees? We often get the sense from the bible that they were an arrogant, self-righteous, judgmental group. And part of that may have been the disciples of Jesus holding a grudge against the group that not only argued against and were often criticized by Jesus, and they conspired to crucify Jesus, but also they continued to harass and torture Christians. So, they were easily portrayed by the Christian community, including the gospel writers, as the evil oppressors.

But according to Jewish historians of the time, the Pharisees were a well-respected religious group. Their name, โ€œPharisee,โ€ is from the Hebrew, โ€œPษ™rลซลกฤซm,โ€ meaning, โ€œseparated ones.โ€ They were known for their piety and faithfulness to the requirements of the law. When Israel returned from the Exile, they recognized that their exile was caused by their corruption, and their return permitted by God because of their repentance and return to righteousness. The Pharisees believed that this legal righteousness was the way for Israel to return to its golden age. Israel was Godโ€™s holy people, a nation of the priestly people of God, set apart, to be a light to the nations, as the scriptures say. And so, the Pharisees took the priestly purity code of the law, required for preparation and conduct for serving God in the Temple, and extended it to apply to all Israelites at all times. As we see in the gospels, while some, perhaps many, might have been corrupt, in which their outward show of piety cloaked their inward attitude of arrogant self-interest, some, perhaps many, were honest, devout, and holy, such as Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea. So the Pharisees, in general, then, were the heroes of most stories, calling sinners back to righteousness to the Lord, distancing themselves from pollution and sin, and so, wise and holy guides for the people.

Who were the tax collectors? They were despised as corrupt and greedy traitors to the nation of Godโ€™s people. They took an exorbitant cut for themselves as agents of the Roman oppressors, who already required high taxes, and collected them without mercy. Historians suggest that tax collectors would have to bid on a certain territory or neighborhood, and pay the Romans in advance for the taxes due to Rome from that area, and then the tax collectors could collect however much above that they wanted for themselves, and live very well. However, they were despised by the Romans for being Jews, and despised by the Jews for cooperating with the Romans. So, they often were not welcome in public places such as temple and synagogue, for being unclean and immoral and strongly disliked. So in most stories, they would obviously be the bad guy, the scoundrel, the proud and rich weasel who would always get their comeuppance. Always.

So, all that is to really help you see how shocking it would have been to hear Jesusโ€™ parable in our gospel today. Jesus often would have surprises and twists in his parables to help people to remember them and think about them. He was, of course, a master storyteller. So if you were hearing a story that starts with, โ€œTwo people went up to the temple area to pray; one was a Pharisee and the other was a tax collector,โ€ you might not yet know the story, but you knew that the Pharisee was going to be the good guy, and the tax-collector was going to be the bad guy. But what does Jesus do? He reverses the roles.


Last week, we heard Jesus tell the story of the widow and the corrupt judge, and our need to be persistent in prayer. Today we hear the story of our need to be humble, or โ€œpoor in spiritโ€ in prayer. Jesus says, โ€œThe Pharisee took up his position and spoke this prayer to himself.โ€ Who is he praying to? Right. โ€œO God, I thank you that I am not like the rest of humanityโ€”greedy, dishonest, adulterousโ€”or even like this tax collector.โ€ So, the only thing he gets right so far is gratitude. But gratitude for what? For being better than the rest of humanity. Just wow. And then he starts praying about the flaws of this other person behind him in the temple: โ€œgreedy, dishonest, adulterous, like this tax collector.โ€ A great lesson in how not to pray. Iโ€™ll often hear people confess being judgmental. [I can tell if someoneโ€™s judgmental just by looking at them. (Thatโ€™s a joke)]. I think that often in our society, we feel so judged, so unworthy, such a hot mess, so aware of our flaws and failures, that itโ€™s very tempting to compare ourselves with someone who seems to be a worse mess than us, just to feel better about ourselves. โ€œAt least Iโ€™m doing better than that loser.โ€ So not only does Jesus condemn that in todayโ€™s gospel, but it also then makes that other person feel judged, because we are judging them, and then they have to go find someone more miserable than them to judge, and now everyone feels judged and like garbage, and thatโ€™s not the way to be the kingdom of God.

And so, this Pharisee doesnโ€™t stop there. โ€œI fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on my whole income.โ€ So the Pharisee prays by praising himself and his good deeds. Now, it is good to fast twice a week and pay tithes on our whole income. But we donโ€™t bring it to prayer boasting about it, expecting God to pat you on the head like a good boy. Forget the good that you do, and come to God as a beggar, poor in spirit, humble, and asking for Godโ€™s mercy and help. Not like this Pharisee, boasting about how close he is to God, how holy he is, like theyโ€™re besties. Remember what Jesus said about the slave who had to serve his master before taking care of himself. โ€œWhen you have done all that you have been commanded, say, โ€˜We are unprofitable servants; we have done what we were obliged to do.โ€™โ€ We canโ€™t do anything that puts God in debt to us for our good deeds. We canโ€™t earn our entitlement to holiness. Everything we do is less than what we ought to be doing if we were perfect. But by coming to God, asking for mercy and help, he accepts our lowly offerings as a parent lovingly praises a child for their crayon art, which the parent happily puts on the refrigerator. Look what you did, isnโ€™t that cute?

So, the good and holy Pharisee is not so good and holy. Letโ€™s look to see how wicked and heartless the wicked and heartless tax-collector is. โ€œBut the tax collector stood off at a distance and would not even raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast and prayed, โ€˜O God, be merciful to me a sinner.โ€™โ€ Oh come on Jesus, we want to hate the tax collector! Heโ€™s supposed to be the villain! But the tax collector humbly confesses how far he is from the holiness and goodness he is called to, how lowly he is to not even be able to raise his eyes to heaven, but is filled with repentance, and the scandal of his own life, and simply prays to God, โ€œBe merciful to me, a sinner.โ€ I think itโ€™s beautiful that half of his prayer is in his bodily posture. Iโ€™m reminded a bit of Pope Saint John Paul IIโ€™s, โ€œTheology of the Body,โ€ which teaches us that since our actions, like our words, can communicate the glory of God and the goodness and truth we as humanity are called to express, that the tax-collector says as much with how he prays as what he prays.


Two footnotes to this description of the pharisee. First, a good act of contrition for the Sacrament of Reconciliation requires three elements: An element of repentance, an element of asking for mercy, and an element of intent to sin no more. Any good act of contrition has these three elements, except for one, which is called โ€œThe Jesus Prayer: โ€œLord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.โ€ Itโ€™s adapted from this part of the gospel, through the mediation of Jesus to God the Father.

The second thing is that if Catholics love and have internalized any part of the gospel, itโ€™s the part about sitting at the back of the church. If I put out chairs outside across the street, Iโ€™m pretty sure people would sit there. No. God became incarnate to be intimate with us, to draw us closer to himself, to share himself, his life, with us. Sitting up front does not mean you think youโ€™re holier, that youโ€™re exalting yourself, or that youโ€™re the nerd who always sits in the front row at school, taking things way too seriously. Our response to God drawing close to us is for us to draw close to him. Yes, his divine splendor and majesty inspire awe and fear, if we were to enter his divine presence with any imperfection. But here he comes to us hidden in signs and sacraments and mystery, accessible to us. And we need to lean into how he wants to improve our life, to heal our hearts, to unite ourselves with him. And for that, we acknowledge any false humility. The truly humble know all the more how much we need God. And we sit at the feet of the Master, as Mary did while her sister worked, or as Saint John at the last supper, resting his head on the sacred heart of our Lord. So next week, donโ€™t go to the back. Get a little closer, donโ€™t be shy. Move forward, respond to the call to draw near. The front of the church should fill up first, with us all eager to receive from the Lord. I promise you, if you sit up front, thereโ€™s like โ€œalmost zeroโ€ chance youโ€™ll be struck by lightning.


To wrap this up, Jesus says, โ€œI tell you, the latter went home justified, (the tax collector), not the former (the Pharisee), for whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted.โ€ If we exalt ourselves, how high can we really reach, to lift ourselves up? A great among sinners? But if we come before God as poor in spirit, needy, a beggar, aware of our many faults, and pray, โ€œO God, be merciful to me, a sinner,โ€ he exalts us to heaven with his grace, affirming that we are good, and we are infinitely loved, and we are forgiven, and helped by his care for us to go out in peace and joy, serving him and serving him in our neighbor, pouring ourselves out spreading the good news of Godโ€™s incredible love for each of us. That we might be able to say, with St. Paul, at the end of our journey, โ€œI am already being poured out like a libation, (emptied as a sacrificial offering) and the time of my departure is at hand. I have competed well; I have finished the race; I have kept the faithโ€ฆ the Lord stood by me and gave me strength, so that through me the proclamation might be completedโ€ฆ To him be glory forever and ever. Amen.โ€

Homily: The Thankful Samaritan Leper

Homily for the 28th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year C (go to readings)
2 Kings 5:14-17
Psalm 98:1, 2-3, 3-4
2 Timothy 2:8-13
Luke 17:11-19


The first king of Israel, a thousand years before Jesus, was King Saul. He wasnโ€™t a good king, and God instructed the prophet Samuel to anoint David to succeed him. Saulโ€™s family was from the north, and Davidโ€™s family was from the south, in Bethlehem, although David made Jerusalem the capitol city. When David decided to build the Jerusalem Temple, his prophet Nathan said it would not be him but his son Solomon who would build the Temple. King David started amassing resources, his son King Solomon built the Temple, and his son King Rehoboam repeatedly raised taxes and other funds to pay for the Temple.

But by this time, the tensions between north and south had gotten so heated that Israel split into two kingdoms, the ten northern tribes of Israel in the North, with its capitol, Samaria, and the two southern tribes of Judah, or Judea, in the South, with itโ€™s capitol, Jerusalem. By a few hundred years later, the North, tired of seeing their money taken south and given to the Jerusalem Temple, set up their own shrines in the North, and they grew financially, morally, and religiously corrupt. For their unfaithfulness, the north was attacked and invaded by the great empire Assyria, with its capital, Ninevah. And the Assyrians wiped out most of the 10 northern tribes, dispersing them among the nations of the world, and Assyria replaced them with 5 different other groups that they had also conquered, each with their own religion and gods (remember the 5 previous husbands of the Samaritan woman!). Some poor areas of Israelites were left, mostly in Galilee, surrounding the Sea of Galilee, or Lake Tiberias.

A few hundred years after that, the southern kingdom of Judah was attacked by the Babylonians, or Chaldeans, and they marched the Judeans, or what was left of Israel, off to exile in Babylon, until the Babylonians were conquered by the Persians and then the Medes, who released Israel to go back to their land, and they resettled Judah and Galilee, while Samaria was still largely occupied by the foreigners who had been put there by the Assyrians, and who had intermixed with the Israelites who were left behind. And so the Israelites who returned from exile, having realized that the exile was their own fault for their corruption, had repented, and had, as they saw it, been released because they had returned to righteousness, now came back to find in their land these mongrels of corrupt breeding and corrupt religion, and these would be the Samaritans. So, by the time of Jesus, you had three geographic groups: the southern area around Jerusalem, under the rule of the Romans, the very northern area around the Sea of Galilee, kind of like Israelโ€™s red-neck country, and in between you had the Samaritans, these half-breeds, who were an abomination. And it didnโ€™t help that the Samaritans and Israelites constantly pushed each otherโ€™s buttons and kept the mutual hatred and tension high. And of course there were neighboring kingdoms such as Syria, Aram, Edom, Moab, etc, with whom Israel was at peace or at war with, depending on the day.

Also in the background of our readings today is the Mosaic Law in Leviticus that covers skin conditions. A fun read. The law really kind of groups a lot of skin diseases under the umbrella term, โ€œleprosy,โ€ although some were temporary, like an allergic rash, some were genetic, like psoriasis, and some were contagious, like fungus, bacteria, or what we now call Hansonโ€™s disease, which is a bacterial infection that progressively kills the nerves, which numbs the skin, and leads to terrible infections and what we think of as leprosy specifically. So, in Leviticus, anyone with a skin disease is instructed to present themselves to the priest, who is not only usually the most-well educated in a village, but also the one whose office it is to protect the integrity and safety of the community, and the priest would declare you clean or unclean. If you were unclean, you had to isolate out of the community, stay far away from anyone else, shout โ€œuncleanโ€ when anyone was approaching, and basically if it wasnโ€™t something that cleared up, it was a life-sentence of isolation and despair, separated from family, friends, employment, temple or synagogue worship, and was often considered a divine punishment. It was a living death.


In our first reading, we meet the great Syrian warlord Namaan. Namaan had everything, but unfortunately, he also had leprosy. But he also had a slave girl from Israel, who informed him that there was a prophet, Elisha, in Israel, who could cure him. So Namaan set out for Israel with a letter from his king to give him safe passage to the King of Israel, asking for Namaan to be healed. Apparently, the letter didnโ€™t mention the prophet, because when the King of Israel read the letter, he tore his garments and exclaimed, โ€œAm I a god with power over life and death, that this man should send someone for me to cure him of leprosy? Take note! You can see he is only looking for a quarrel with me!โ€ So Elisha the prophet hears about this, and sends a message to the king to send Namaan to him. And so Namaan, in all his splendor and gravitas and entourage arrives at Elishaโ€™s house. And Elisha sends out a message to Namaan to wash seven times in the Jordan River, and he will be clean.

This is not the kind of treatment Namaan was used to. He was a very important person. Not only did this humble prophet not come out to greet him, just sending a messenger out, but go down into the sad dumpy mudhole that was the Jordan River, and do it seven times? There are much more beautiful rivers in Syria. And so, heโ€™s angry and ready to go back home. But his servants talk him out of it. So then we pick up our first reading, โ€œNaaman went down and plunged into the Jordan seven times at the word of Elisha, the man of God. His flesh became again like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean of his leprosy.โ€ So not only was he healed, but you can imagine the rough, ruddy and calloused skin of a warrior. But it says his flesh became again like the flesh of a little child. We could say he was recreated, restored, to the original perfection that was lost. So thatโ€™s important. But whatโ€™s more important comes next. This foreigner, Namaan says to Elisha, “Now I know that there is no God in all the earth, except in Israelโ€ฆ please let me, your servant, have two mule-loads of earth, for I will no longer offer holocaust or sacrifice to any other god except to the LORD.

You might remember that when Jesus started his ministry in Galilee, in the synagogue of Nazareth, he read from the scroll of Isaiah, and then he said, โ€œthere were many lepers in Israel during the time of Elisha the prophet; yet not one of them was cleansed, but only Naaman the Syrian.โ€ And when the people in the synagogue heard this, they were all filled with fury. Why? Because that part of the scroll was a reference to the Messiah, they had heard of the signs and wonders he had done, and Jesus had just identified himself as the Messiah. But they were looking for a Messiah that was Israelโ€™s Messiah, their long-awaited hero, who would free them from the oppression of the Romans. They werenโ€™t interested in a Messiah whose attention was to those outside of Israel. They didnโ€™t understand the full depth of the meaning of the Messiah, and that this was a spiritual rescue mission for eternal liberty, not a political mission for Israel. Their understanding of Godโ€™s gift was too small, or perhaps Godโ€™s gift was greater than they really wanted. They werenโ€™t interested in those around them, just their own experience of suffering.

But again, as Jesus pointed out, they rejected him because they didnโ€™t really know the scriptures. Look at our psalm, which of course is also from the Old Testament: โ€œSing to the LORD a new song, for he has done wondrous deeds; in the sight of the nations, he has revealed his justice. Sing joyfully to the LORD, all you lands!โ€

And so we end with seeing Jesus put his words into his works in the Gospel Reading from Luke. It starts off by saying, โ€œAs Jesus continued his journey to Jerusalem, he traveled through Samaria and Galilee. As he was entering a village, ten lepers met him. They stood at a distance from him and raised their voices, saying, โ€˜Jesus, Master! Have pity on us!โ€™ And when he saw them, he said, โ€˜Go show yourselves to the priests.โ€™โ€

So Jesus was in a sort of unsettled neutral territory between Galilee and Samaria, and he encounters these ten lepers, a mix of the two. Because suffering is kind of a great equalizer. They were banished from both their own communities and came together as the island of misfit toys, Israelites and Samaritans together. And they shout from a distance, as theyโ€™re required to do, but they donโ€™t shout, โ€œUnclean!โ€ They shout, โ€œLord have mercy,โ€ just as we always do at the beginning of Mass. โ€œKyrie, eleison!โ€ in Greek.

And Jesus doesnโ€™t approach them, he just instructs them, โ€œShow yourselves to the priest,โ€ As they were going, they were cleansed, so that when they would arrive at the priest, he would declare them clean, he would declare them not only healed and restored bodily, but restored as part of the body of the community. He healed their despair, their isolation, but he also healed their bonds of love, and their capacity to worship God in the temple, which they lost when they became unclean.

Now, a nice-intentioned modern person might have told them, โ€œWell, you can go do what you want. Donโ€™t listen to those rigid, exclusion-minded people.โ€ But thatโ€™s โ€œcheap grace.โ€ It compromises truth to feel nice. But it robs people of the great joy of healing and reconciliation and thanksgiving experienced, after who knows how long of conversion, and praying and hoping for real healing and reconciliation. And God knows that the longer and deeper that suffering and longing is experienced, the greater and more complete is the joy and gratitude when that suffering is healed by the great mercy of God.

While Iโ€™m sure all the lepers in our gospel reading were joyful at their healing and restoration, only the Samaritan had the thanksgiving to return to Jesus. And it says, โ€œAnd one of them, realizing he had been healed, returned, glorifying God in a loud voice; and he fell at the feet of Jesus and thanked him.โ€ Not only did he thank him, he bowed, he prostratedโ€”which you would only do in worship of Godโ€”at the feet of Jesus. He clearly understood that Jesus had power of God. Remember what the King of Israel had said, โ€œAm I a god with power over life and death, that this man should send someone for me to cure him of leprosy?โ€

Nothing earthly could cure leprosy, the only hope was God, and here, God had healed, reconciled, and restored. Thanks be to God! And for the scriptures to point out that only this Samaritan, this foreigner, recognized Jesusโ€™ divine power, was testimony, like Elisha healing Naaman, that God is calling all peopleโ€”you, and me, and all the worldโ€”to recognize how we have been healed, how we are called to be restored and reconciled to God and to each other, and how we are called to offer our eucharistia, our thanksgiving praise to God. To โ€œsing to the LORD a new song, for he has done wondrous deeds!โ€

Homily: Increase Our Faith

Homily for the 27th Sunday of Ordinary Time (Year C) (go to readings)
Habakkuk 1:2-3; 2:2-4
Psalm 95:1-2, 6-7, 8-9
2 Timothy 1:6-8, 13-14
Luke 17:5-10


Youโ€™ve heard of the 20th century Catholic social activist Dorothy Day, a woman many considered a living saint. Many admirers came to visit her, to have a look at her, to speak to her, to touch her, if possible. Sometimes they would tell her, โ€œYou are a saint,โ€ or she would overhear others saying of her, โ€œShe is a saint.โ€ She would get upset, turn to them, and say, โ€œDonโ€™t say that. Donโ€™t make it too easy for yourself. Donโ€™t escape this way. I know why you are saying, โ€˜she is a saint.โ€™ You say that to convince yourself that you are different from me, that I am different from you. I am like you. You could do what I do. You donโ€™t need any more than you have; get moving!โ€ While that might be a good introduction to our readings, I think a good summary might be a quote from the Old Testament prophet Zechariah: โ€œDo not despise small beginnings, for the Lord rejoices to see the work begin. (Zec 4:10).

Weโ€™re blessed with a short gospel reading this week, and in the gospel of Luke it follows right after the parable of Lazarus and the rich man which we heard last week, and then thereโ€™s a few verses about radical forgiveness and the danger of leading others astray. And then we have the first part of our gospel reading. The disciples ask Jesus, โ€œIncrease our faith,โ€ and he responds โ€œIf you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you would say to this mulberry tree, โ€˜Be uprooted and planted in the sea,โ€™ and it would obey you.โ€ Mustard seeds are like black ground pepper, theyโ€™re very small, but they yield a surprisingly large bush, which is actually rather invasive like a weed, it spreads very fast. So Jesus more than once has taught his disciples that their faith should be like a mustard seed. A seed of a little faith received by a heart thatโ€™s fertile ground can change a personโ€™s whole life, and even those around them! And a little seed of a community of believers can spread and lead to the conversion of the Roman Empire!

So, the mulberry tree is a tree with an expansive underground root system. Ancient Israel actually had regulations that planting trees had to be 30 feet from a well or a building or a road so their roots wouldnโ€™t expand out and ruin the foundations or the well, but mulberry trees couldnโ€™t be planted within 50 feet of anything to allow for their huge root system. They were very firmly planted trees, and they could be moved only with great difficulty. But Jesus says that with faith like a mustard-seed you could say to a mulberry tree to uproot itself and be planted in the salty sea, in sand, and it would do it. So, we might say that when we live by our faith, we should expect God to yield unbelievable outcomes to our prayers and our obedience to faith. We are called to cooperate with grace, and grace will produce results that could never have been anticipated, that defy what we could imagine.

But also, the disciples ask for this gift of increase of faith after Jesus challenges them. And so, another thing we can get out of this image of the mustard seed is that we shouldnโ€™t procrastinate being bold in living out our faith because we donโ€™t think weโ€™re ready. We donโ€™t need big faith, we need little faith, in fact, we need whatever faith we have, and to act on it, and let God yield the increase. To say we need to wait until we have more faith is to say that it depends on us instead of on God. You canโ€™t wait until youโ€™re ready, because youโ€™ll wait the rest of your life, because youโ€™ll never feel ready. You have to just do the thing, to launch, and course correct along the way, like learning to ride a bike. You canโ€™t ride if youโ€™re not moving forward.

On my blog where I post many of my homilies, I have one of my favorite quotes from G. K. Chesterton, โ€œAnything worth doing is worth doing badly.โ€ The meaning is that some things are so important that we cannot put off doing them simply because weโ€™re not the best person, or we donโ€™t have enough time or ability, or all the proper preparations. The simple importance of the thing requires it to be done, and the simple fact of having done it is more important than whether we have done it as well as we would have liked. The problem with mustard-seed sized faith isnโ€™t that our faith isnโ€™t even as big as a mustard seed, it’s that weโ€™re too big. Our faith is too much about what we have to do, or what we have to be. Just say yes to God and start out, get some momentum, and let God show you what he does with that. That will make you humble. Keep going, and he will keep you going the right way.

So then thereโ€™s the second part of our gospel reading, about the slave that worked all day, then has to make dinner, before he or she can have dinner themselves. And we might get a little grumpy toward the master there, but remember the masterโ€™s an image of God, so get yourself back down to a mustard seed, and try to see what heโ€™s trying to teach you. What heโ€™s saying is that you can never do so much for God that God owes you anything. You canโ€™t do so much good that you have one up on God, or you can manipulate God into your debt. We are unworthy servants. So, the good that we get from God is out of his goodness and his love toward us, not because he owes us. And our work should not be motivated out of trying to get anything out of God.

How many times does our prayer just sound like making wishes we want God to fulfill, like heโ€™s a genie, instead of a dialogue of love with God? Often, we look at prayer as trying to convince God to give us the good things we want. The thing is, God already wants to give us good things, but heโ€™s trying to get us to want to receive the good things he wants to give us. Often the problem is that what we think we really want is far too small compared to what God wants to give us. So God has to wait while he guides and prepares us to receive his superabundant gifts. And it seems in that time that heโ€™s just not answering our prayers, it might seem like heโ€™s not even listening.

Part of the above paragraph is inspired by (ok, taken from) my absolute favorite of the Lighthouse Media CDs and MP3s, given by Msgr. Thomas Richter of the Diocese of Bismarck, entitled, “Trust in the Lord.” I’ve listened to it countless times, and I cannot recommend it enough. I’d link it here for free, but the only online free copy has poor quality. So get the MP3, and tell me what you think!

Thatโ€™s where the Old Testament prophet Habakuk is in our first reading. Itโ€™s a very small book, only three chapters, and Habakuk is complaining that God is allowing his people to see such destruction and suffering. โ€œHow long, O LORD? I cry for help, but you do not listen! I cry out to you, โ€˜Violence!โ€™ but you do not intervene.โ€ This is a terrible experience, and weโ€™ve all been there, and depending on what weโ€™re asking, it seems like forever. And many people lose their faith in suffering and grief, and it seems like prayers are useless and God is not even there listening.

But God responds to Habakuk, โ€œThen the LORD answered me and said: โ€˜Write down the vision clearly upon the tablets, so that one can read it readily. For the vision still has its time, presses on to fulfillment, and will not disappoint; if it delays, wait for it, it will surely come, it will not be late. The rash one has no integrity; but the just one, because of his faith, shall live.โ€ The vision is of course the rescue of Israel from their oppression and suffering. And Habakuk is to write it down clearly because it is not only for him, but for all to see that God has been preparing this vision and will fulfill it, and all will see how God has made and fulfilled his promise of redemption for his people. And of course, the ultimate fulfillment of this promise is in Christ, the true and perfect redemption of God’s people from the oppression of sin, their call to conversion, and the lasting peace through the open gates of heaven.

And this ties back to our gospel reading, teaching the kind of faith we are to have. It cannot be a demanding faith, or a weak faith, but a powerful faith. Paul tells Timothy in our second reading, โ€œFor God did not give us a spirit of cowardice but rather of power and love and self-control. So do not be ashamed of your testimony to our Lordโ€ฆโ€ and then he says, โ€œbut bear your share of hardship for the gospel with the strength that comes from God.โ€ So, God is working and preparing his gifts, even when we cannot sense it. So yes, we do have to suffer, as Christ our Lord suffered, with great faith in God. And God gives us the grace and strength to persevere in waiting in confident faith, in sure and certain hope. God said to Habakuk, โ€œif it delays, wait for itโ€ฆ The rash one has no integrity; but the just one, because of his faith, shall live.โ€

So, the one who is impatient loses their faith, but the one who perseveres, who relies on God to supply his grace and an increase of faith, shall live and see the goodness of God. Thereโ€™s a very loose but beautiful interpretation of this that says, โ€œThere will come a time when your tears will fall not because of your troubles, but because God has answered your prayers.โ€

And so, we can end on the high note of our responsorial psalm, Psalm 95, which, if you pray the liturgy of the hours, you pray at the beginning of every day. โ€œIf today you hear his voice, harden not your hearts. Come, let us sing joyfully to the LORD; let us acclaim the Rock of our salvation. Let us come into his presence with thanksgiving; let us joyfully sing psalms to him. Come, let us bow down in worship; let us kneel before the LORD who made us. For he is our God, and we are the people he shepherds, the flock he guides.โ€ How beautiful is the life God invites us to, even redeeming our suffering, our tears, our patient waiting on him, and our privilege to eagerly to serve him in love and joy.

Homily: The Main Thing

Twenty-fifth Sunday of Ordinary Time (Year C) (go to readings)
Amos 8:4-7
Psalm 113:1-2, 4-6, 7-8
1 Timothy 2:1-8
Luke 16:1-13


A recent article about an interview with Pope Leo XIV summarizes his message, โ€œMy priority is the Gospel, not solving the worldโ€™s problems.โ€ In the interview, Pope Leo says, โ€œI donโ€™t see my primary role as trying to be the solver of the worldโ€™s problems. I donโ€™t see my role as that at all, really, although I think that the Church has a voice, a message that needs to continue to be preached, to be spoken and spoken loudly.โ€

In todayโ€™s social and political climate, itโ€™s too easy to get pulled away from what should be our main mission. In the words of Stephen Covey, โ€œThe main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.โ€ And the main thing for the Church is to carry forward the message of the gospel of Jesus Christ, in how we think, how we see the world, how we speak, and how we live.

In a recent parish meeting we were talking about the call to evangelization, and how Catholics seem to be notoriously shy about stepping up as messengers of the gospel. And the comment was made that the last few generations of Catholics feel very underequipped to talk about our faith. And there is so much that the Catholic Church has taught and done across two thousand years, itโ€™s difficult for anyone to feel comfortable with their understanding of all this and to have what feels like an awkward conversation about the faith.

Fair enough. But is that what evangelization is? Teaching theology and Church history? How many people have seen the Lord of the Rings movies? Did you like them? Were they amazing? Inspiring? Did you tell anyone that? Did you suggest that they watch them? Maybe even suggest that they read the books? Thatโ€™s the basic idea of evangelization. Weโ€™re not sharing the good news about the Church teachings or history. Thatโ€™s important, but not the main thing. The main thing is how much we love Jesus, how inspired we are by him, by our relationship with him, by his words in the scriptures and in our hearts, how our lives have more joy, hope, beauty, and love, because our faith in Jesus enriches our life. It can even be our story of how we once were so lost, and the effect of our encounter and putting our faith in him to work in our lives, and how that has been a risk that has paid unbelievable dividends. Saint Paul made his conversion story the basis of all his ministry (“I was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and an arrogant man, but I have been mercifully treated because I acted out of ignorance in my unbelief. Indeed, the grace of our Lord has been abundant, along with the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.” he says in 1 Tim 1:13). Or the beautiful line of Mary Magdalene which she says to Nicodemus in the Chosen, “I was one way, and now I am completely different. And the thing that happened in between was Him.” And then we ask if they might like to see if coming to Church and hopefully having an encounter with Christ might help them, and we tell them weโ€™ll meet them at Church.

I think Catholics sometimes use our poor catechesis (which indeed is a tragic reality) about our faith as a delay tactic. After I take some bible courses or join this prayer group, or this catechesis class, and maybe after that, Iโ€™ll feel comfortable sharing the gospel. First, please do learn more about our faith (to learn it more is to love it more). Do keep growing your relationship with Jesus (such as spending time in the Adoration Chapel) and sharing with others the peace and joy that comes from that quality time with the Lord. Your own words flowing from your heart shining with the love of Christ are your best tools of evangelization! But second, that will not make you comfortable sharing the gospel. The only thing that will make it comfortable is to keep doing it, like other things that feel awkward at first, but you get better at it.

But itโ€™s easy to get caught up in the world. To have a strong opinion, the right opinion, and get fixated on correcting the other side for their errors of judgment, facts (or ignorance of facts), and beliefs. Itโ€™s easy to get caught up in defending one side or the other, or a particular figure, perhaps one villanized or silenced by the machinations of political opponents. And of course we know of the rash of shocking tragedies that have rocked our society, especially the police officers shot near Spring Grove. We thank them for their service, pray for the three who died, and the two recovering in the hospital, and their families and fellow officers and other first responders, and for an end of violence and the taking of innocent human life. This is an important thing, but not the main thing.


Our Old Testament reading from the prophet Amos harshly criticizes those caught up in the values of the world, particularly the greed and selfishness that gives God the minimum while being impatient to get back to โ€œreal lifeโ€ and making money, even to the extent of being dishonest in business. โ€œWhen will the new moon be over,โ€ you ask, โ€œthat we may sell our grain, and the sabbath, that we may display the wheat?โ€ How much longer is Mass going to last? Why do I have to go to Mass on Holy Days of Obligation? These get in the way of work and my schedule, โ€œmy time.โ€  Maybe I can sneak out before itโ€™s over, especially if it means I donโ€™t have to deal with other people in the parking lot. Why does the Church say we have to do this or that, or it says we canโ€™t do this or that? Everyone else seems more free to do what they want.

God has given us everything, he gave the maximum sacrifice, he gives the maximum revelation, the maximum grace, he even made the best possible most beautiful world, which he then entrusted to our stewardship in our free will. God is perfect in all things, including his generosity. And our response should not only be what is required of us, but it should be with joy and thanksgiving, and to return the maximum to him in his glory and goodness. If we made our entire life, our maximum offering, to him, with the same family, job, vocation, and gifts that he has given us, how would our life look different? Not only staying for all of the Mass, but having read and prayed on the readings as our preparation, arriving early to focus our hearts, being as engaged as possible during the liturgy and our spoken and sung participation, receiving the Eucharist with maximum reverence, and staying a few minutes after Mass to give thanks and ask for his blessings throughout the upcoming week. Giving intentionally and generously a portion of our material resources to the support of the Church and to various charitable opportunities. Praying with the scriptures daily, driving with patience and safety, working our best at our jobs (or at school) with maximum virtue, kindness, preparation, and wisdom, living out the various teachings of the Church in their intent to sanctify and open every moment of our lives to glorify God and receive the grace of God available to us, that we might “pray without ceasing” by making our every moment, every aspect of our humanity and our time, talent, and treasure, an offering to him. Would your life be more or less holy? More or less successful? More or less happy? Godโ€™s way is always the best way. But thatโ€™s just the fruit of keeping the main thing the main thingโ€”making our life about loving and serving God, including serving him in our neighbors. And if our neighbors donโ€™t know him, inviting them into that relationship and inviting them to church.


Our gospel reading has long been considered one of Jesusโ€™ most difficult parables to understand. Why does he tell of the rich master (usually an image of God in the parables of Jesus), praising a dishonest thief? Without getting into the weeds on the parable, I want to just take a few lines out of it in the time we have here.

โ€œFor the children of this world are more prudent in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light.โ€ The people committed to worldly life are better at being worldly than the people of faith are at being commited to living like people of faith. The life of faith is meant to be transformative. And a lot of times, people of faith are more like the worldly than we are at living like we are set apart from it. I recently heard a quote that said, โ€œJesus called us to be salt and light. What do salt and light have in common? They change the environments they come in contact with. They don’t conform, they don’t affirm, they transform what they come in contact with. Are you transforming the environment you are coming in contact with? โ€ฆWe must challenge people to be greater, to reach higher, to be biblical, to be Christlike, as we continue to be salt and light.โ€ That was quoting Charlie Kirk. He may have talked about politics and social issues, but he always kept the main thing the main thing: bringing people to Christ. And in the wake of his death, young adults are checking out church, some for the first time, in a way they havenโ€™t in generations (especially at that stage of life when most Christians drift away from church).

Then one of the difficult phrases of this parable, maybe made even harder with the translation, โ€œI tell you, make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, so that when it fails, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings.โ€ Jesus is using the phrase dishonest wealth to mean the things of this world, passing material things, earthly money. And by making friends with it he means use it to wisely invest it in spiritually beneficial ways, in holy ways, knowing how unimportant it really is in terms of eternity, so that when you leave this world and you canโ€™t take it with you, that you have made yourself into a spiritually rich person, having been a good and holy steward of what was entrusted to your care.

If you are not trustworthy with what belongs to another, who will give you what is yours?” If you are a good and virtuous steward of God’s gifts entrusted to your care, investing them to become rich in what matters to God, you will receive the reward of your responsible care of those gifts: the greatest gift, your eternal life, the perfect fulfillment of your humanity in God, what you were created for. Because you kept the main thing the main thing. You kept your focus on God, on your eternal soul, and the eternal souls of those around you, which you have a responsibility for, to the extent that you have a potential impact on them. Read C. S. Lewisโ€™ essay, โ€œThe Weight of Glory,โ€ itโ€™s a beautiful reflection on that topic, of the weight of obligation we have of being a holy influence on others for the sake of their eternal heavenly glory.


And so, itโ€™s easy to think that what is most important is what the world is telling us to be emotionally invested in, or even the worldy effects of the gospel and the Church teachings that flow from it. Yes, there are political, social, and moral dimensions of Church teachingโ€”care for the poor, the environment, for peace, for morality, for human rights, which have their source in God’s generous Creation and our God-given image and dignity.ย  And as Christians we do need to be involved in the public dialogue, and in voting wisely for what the gospel requires of us. But these are indirect ways of serving the gospel. Secondary things. Not the main thing. The main thing is not solving the problems of the world. The main thing is the gospel. The Church has a prophetic role in the world, the voice of conscience, reminding us of good and evil, life and death, and we should understand, share, and live the prophetic truth of the gospel in our lives. Is it Jesus that comes out of our mouth? That comes out in our actions? Is it Jesus alone that sits on the throne of our heart? He has given us everything. Everything we do is by his generosity poured upon us. Do we respond by serving him as generously in return? Do we praise him, glorify him, serve him, share him, speak to others of him, and keep him as the center of our life?

Because thatโ€™s the main thing.

Homily: Exaltation of the Cross

Feast of the Exulatation of the Holy Cross (Sept 14) (go to readings)
Numbers 21:4b-9
Psalm 78:1bc-2, 34-35, 36-37, 38
Philippians 2:6-11
John 3:13-17


Last week in the gospel reading we heard Jesus tell his disciples, โ€œWhoever does not carry his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.โ€ Today we celebrate the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross. So letโ€™s look at the mystery of the cross.

Our first reading is from one of the first books in the bible, the book of Numbers. It presents the people of Israel on their exodus from Egypt to the promised land, and this book picks up after they enter into the covenant and set out from Mount Sinai.

All along the journey, the Israelites have been murmuring against Moses and against God. Just a note, my friends, the people murmuring among themselves is never a good thing in the bible. Always a temptation; never a good thing. In response to their complaining that they would rather go back to Egypt to full bellies and slavery, than embraces the invitation to the challenges to purify their hearts from slavery and become truly free as the people of God, God had given them the encouragement of the miracle of the manna, the miraculous bread of heaven that covered the land each morning, except for the Sabbath, and which would finish with their first Passover in the Promised Land. And each evening God sent quail into the camp and people ate them. And to slake their thirst, God provided water from the rock in the wilderness. And that kept them content, for a moment. Then we pick up with our reading today: โ€œWith their patience worn out by the journey, the people complained against God and Moses, โ€˜Why have you brought us up from Egypt to die in this desert, where there is no food or water? We are disgusted with this wretched food!โ€™โ€ Their response to the miraculous bread of heaven is โ€œwe are disgusted with this wretched food!?โ€ Now, to borrow from the Hebrew language, thatโ€™s some chutzpah. Or to say it in English, โ€œthe audacity!โ€

God, in punishment, overruns their camp with seraph serpents. Seraph is from the Hebrew word for โ€œburning.โ€ The highest choir of angels are the โ€œseraphim,โ€ the โ€œburning ones,โ€ the ones closest and who most intimately participate in the burning furnace of divine love. So presumably the bite of these seraph serpents caused inflammation, a burning reaction, and many of the people died. And this divine punishment on Israel had its intended effect. โ€œThen the people came to Moses and said, โ€˜We have sinned in complaining against the LORD and you. Pray the LORD to take the serpents from us.โ€™โ€ Holy punishment is always out of love, and with the hope of conversion, reconciliation, and salvation. The same with the regulations taught by the Church. Itโ€™s not intended to exclude but given out of love for the integrity of the person and the faith, and with the hope of conversion, reconciliation, and salvation. How people respond to it is up to their free will, and their choice of humility or pride.

So now we get to why this reading was chosen for todayโ€™s feast: โ€œSo Moses prayed for the people, and the LORD said to Moses, โ€˜Make a seraph and mount it on a pole, and if any who have been bitten look at it, they will live.โ€™ Moses accordingly made a bronze serpent and mounted it on a pole, and whenever anyone who had been bitten by a serpent looked at the bronze serpent, he lived.โ€ Now, while the psalm and second reading are important for todayโ€™s feast, I want to skip to the gospel reading, with these words fresh in our minds.

โ€œJesus said to Nicodemusโ€ฆ โ€˜And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, so that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.โ€™โ€ Why does Jesus make a reference to the serpent on the pole? Iโ€™ve heard people say that the serpent is one of the Old Testament images of Jesus. Iโ€™m sorry, I donโ€™t think so. The biblical image of a serpent is usually the opposite of Jesus. So, what is it then? Itโ€™s an image of the cost of our rebellion against God. Think about what Jesus looked like on the cross. Scourged at the pillar, crowned with thorns, carried and was nailed to the cross (bloody, beaten, and naked). Now, some people rightly say that thousands of people were crucified by the Roman Empire; Jesus wasnโ€™t unique in being crucified. True. But Jesus was unique in carrying the enitre weight of humanityโ€™s rebellion against God, our sin and anger and resentment and pride and infidelity and disobedience against God, bearing all that in his humanity, held together by his divinity. His appearance on the cross was horrific to behold. Like the Israelites being instructed to look at the bronze serpent, the consequence of their rebellion against God, we can look at a crucifix and see the consequence of our rebellion against God. And we can see the love of God in that he accepted the consequence of our sin to save us. The word โ€œsalvationโ€ and the word โ€œhealingโ€ come from the same root. Something that is โ€œsalutaryโ€ is both for our salvation and for our healing. So, it isnโ€™t just that Jesus was crucified to save us, like he wrote a check to cover our debt to let us off the hook. He was crucified also to heal us, to root out from within us the poisonous spirit of sin and death, that he might put in us his Holy Spirit of light and eternal life.

We have the obligation to live out, in this life and in this world, this holy spirit of light and eternal life. I often say at funerals that we often say that our dearly departed has recently entered eternal life. In a way, yes, but thatโ€™s not really accurate. They entered eternal life at their baptism (when they die to the spirit of fallen humanity, and take on the spirit of Christ). And hopefully that person had discerned and lived out this new spiritual life, by how they exercise their free will, live out their vocation to holiness, and fulfill their particular mission in the Body of Christ for Godโ€™s plan of salvation for the world. Thatโ€™s what all of us are called to, obligated to. Itโ€™s what every human being is created for, and where we find our deepest joy, peace, and fulfillment. And so it is our obligation of love to share that message and call people to this truth, that they, also, would know the deep joy, peace, and fulfillment of living out their vocation.


This week, as we were just recovering from all the media coverage and reactions to the shooting at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis two weeks earlier, then on the eve of remembering how September 11, 2001 rocked our American society with shocking tragedy, on Wednesday, September 10 our American society was again rocked with shocking tragedy at the killing of Charlie Kirk in the middle of a conversation with an opponent about mass shooters and gun violence.

Mass media and social media have been flooded with messages of his noble and friendly character, his strong Christian faith, and how they informed his well-defended political and social values, but most especially, how he saw it as his mission to talk, to engage, to listen, to ask questions, to be truly open to the joy of meeting other people, even (or maybe especially) if they disagreed with him, and doing what he could, as he saw it, to lead them more deeply into truth. Of course many people, especially on the college campuses where he did much of his public debates, disagreed with his Christian or conservative views, and many saw him as a dangerous voice promoting what they saw as hate. But to his core, even publicly acknowledging that he had received death threats against himself and his family, Charlie led his life courageously, engaged opponents with genuine openness, and fully giving God the credit for any of his success, professionally or personally, including the virtues of his character, and the beautiful gift of his family. He saw and accepted the inherent danger and vulnerability of his public events as the cross he was called to carry for his personal vocation to spread the gospel and speak the truth.


And this then is the final part of our reflection. The area in our life where we know we are most weak, where we are most tempted, where we most sin, where know we need Godโ€™s grace to help us, requires the cross of our humility, to acknowledge we need God, and to reach up, like a little child, to ask God for his help. And because we know God will give us his help, and that this area of weakness is where we will experience his love and grace poured into our life, we can exalt in the cross of our weakness, because asking God into our life is what will save us, and that area of weakness is where we are most of aware of our need for that. St. Paul was never ashamed to speak about his weakness, โ€œI will rather boast most gladly of my weaknesses, in order that the power of Christ may dwell with me.โ€, “I was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and an arrogant man, but I have been mercifully treated…Indeed, the grace of our Lord has been abundant,” and โ€œIt is not I who live, but Christ who lives within me.โ€ And in our gratitude we lift up our praise to Jesus, we lift up Christ, who came into our humanity with his divinity. Thatโ€™s the meaning of our incarnation. We lift up Christ as our hope in God. Jesus is our perfect offering of prayer and worship of the Father. Jesus said, โ€œWhen I am lifted up, I shall draw all men to myself.โ€ That means a number of things. It means when he is lifted up on the cross for our repentance, and to pay the cost of the salvation of all humanity. It means when he is lifted up in the resurrection in victory over death. It means when he is lifted up in the ascension and crowned with glory. It means when he is lifted up in our hearts and acknowledged, worshiped, and obeyed as our Lord and our God. The Greek for that โ€œlifted upโ€, also means exalted, hupsoรณ. It is similar to what we find in our second reading from the letter to the Philippians, โ€œGod highly exalted him, hyper-hupsoรณ, for his obedient, faithful, incomprehensible sacrifice in love in embracing his part in the plan of salvation, his death and resurrection to save us.

So, in our feast we celebrate today we lift up, we exalt, the cross, because by his holy Cross he has redeemed the world. We lift up the cross we carry of our own weakness, because in entrusting our weakness to Christ as an offering to be transformed by his grace, we are made strong in Him.”For God so loved the world that he gave his only Sonโ€ฆ [not] to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him.โ€

Homily: “The beauty remains; the pain passes.”

โ€˜Landscape at Beaulieuโ€™, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, 1893

Twenty-Third Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year C (go to readings)
Wisdom 9:13-18b
Psalm 90:3-4, 5-6, 12-13, 14 and 17
Philemon 9-10, 12-17
Luke 14:25-33


French artists Henri Matisse and Auguste Renoir were close friends and frequent companions, even though Renoir was twenty-eight years older than Matisse. During the last several years of his life, Renoir was virtually crippled by arthritis; nevertheless, he painted every day, and when his fingers were no longer supple enough to hold the brush correctly, he had his wife, Alice, attach the paintbrush to his hand in order that he might continue his work. Matisse visited him daily. One day, as he watched his older friend wincing in excruciating pain with each colorful stroke, he asked, โ€œAuguste, why do you continue to paint when you are in such agony?โ€ Renoirโ€™s response was immediate, โ€œThe beauty remains; the pain passes.โ€ Passion for his art empowered Renoir to paint until the day he died. Those who continue to admire the enduring beauty of his smiling portraits, his landscapes, his still-life studies, will find no trace therein of the pain required to create them. Most will agree that the temporary cost was worth the enduring result.


Our readings today give us the theme of putting what is eternal over what is temporal, what is true, good, and beautiful, what endures forever, over what will pass away, like dust in the wind. But the problem is that this is very difficult for us. The power of what is visual, what is seen, what is pleasing to the physical senses, what is urgent (regardless of whether it is important) and short term, immediately in front of us, claims a great, even overwhelming, demand on our attention.

But our readings are trying to pull us out of this materialistic, temporal mindset and fix our attention on what is higher, of higher reality, higher importance, higher dignity, and requires a higher level of priorities to understand, believe, and practice.

In our gospel reading, Jesus is giving us the true understanding of what it costs to be his disciple. People want to call themselves Christian, and claim the reward of being Christian, without wanting to understand the cost, consider the cost, and pay the cost. They want Christianity on their own terms, and thatโ€™s not at all how Christianity works. As someone said, โ€œAll are welcome, but on Christโ€™s terms, not on their own.โ€ And itโ€™s not that Christโ€™s terms have become more strict, more out of touch with society, but rather that society has become more out of touch with Christโ€™s terms, the cost of what takes to make our lives about what is above, resplendent with divine wisdom, rather than the dust on the wind that is what the world wants us to focus on.

In the first part of our gospel reading, Jesus teaches that he has a greater calling on his disciples than even the relationships of family. In ancient Israel, family was everything, who your family is was who you are, your role in society, how you were related to Israel, the ancient hereditary Father of the Israelites. This is why genealogies were so important in the bible and in Israel. And the only thing more important than oneโ€™s family was God himself. So for Jesus to teach that โ€œHe who loves father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; he who loves son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of meโ€ is to say that Jesus is the one thing more important than family; Jesus is revealing his divine identity, by taking this divine prerogative of being the one thing more important than family. In fact, in other places of the gospels (“ย For whoever does the will of my Father in heavenย is my brother and sister and mother” Mt 12:50), Jesus teaches that oneโ€™s spiritual family of the Church is more important than oneโ€™s blood family of the flesh; and its no wonder why he attracted attention, both positive and negative.

Jesus then teaches โ€œWhoever does not carry his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.โ€ Weโ€™ve heard this many times. In the time of the early Church, when Christians were persecuted and executed for their faith, this could have been taken literally. To be a disciple, you had to accept that you have to hold to this faith all the way. At many times during the Churchโ€™s history, we see Christians not only executed, but their property confiscated, their professional credentials and opportunities disappear, their public reputation and privileges destroyed. And we see this script being replayed today, not only in other countries where Christians are literally executed, but even in our own society. Christian bakers and venue owners are targeted for refusing to cooperate in supporting same-sex marriage, medical staff are persecuted for refusing to participate in (or even criticize) abortion or transgender affirmation, and the Little Sisters of the Poor are being sued by the Pennsylvania attorney general for the seventh time (after theyโ€™ve been exonerated in 6 previous lawsuits) for refusing to include contraception in their employee healthcare packages. To be Christian is to lay all of what we are and all that we have on the altar of God, to be sacrificed if called to do so for the sake of faithfulness to the kingdom of heaven.

But since many of us will hopefully not be called to such explicit examples of carrying the cross of the faith, we can also understand this requirement as crucifying those things in our lifeโ€”our evil habits, our unhealthy attachments, our disordered attractionsโ€”that are incompatible with the call to holiness and the teaching of the Church. That doesnโ€™t mean that these things arenโ€™t good. Families are good. Our reputation, our businesses we have built up, our money and resources and security, these are all goodโ€”even some of our attachments and attractions, although they might be wounded and distorted, and need to be healed to be healthy and holy. But nothing else is the ultimate good, which is God. We have to put first things first, and other things afterward. If we put secondary things in the place that only God should be, we lose everything.

Jesus then teaches his disciples that this is a high calling, the very highest demand, and before deciding to be a Christian, it is foolish to start if youโ€™re not going resolve to take it all the way to the finish, come what may (as a man considering building a tower, or a general considering engaging in battle). If you quit, or compromise, what it means to be Christian, what the Christian faith teaches and requires, you lose the only thing that matters, and you also become a stumbling block for others. As Yoda said to Luke Skywalker, โ€œDo, or do not; there is no try.โ€ If we tell ourselves we are merely trying, it’s a preparation to have an excuse for failing, instead of fully committing everything to what is required.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the Lutheran minister who died resisting against the Naziโ€™s, talked about cheap grace: โ€œCheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christโ€ฆ Costly grace is the treasure hidden in the field; for the sake of it a man will go and sell all that he has. It is the pearl of great price to buy which the merchant will sell all his goods. It is the kingly rule of Christ, for whose sake a man will pluck out the eye which causes him to stumbleโ€ฆ It is costly because it costs a man his life, and it is grace because it gives a man the only true life. It is costly because it condemns sin, and grace because it justifies the sinner.โ€ So, what we might call the โ€œbad newsโ€ is that there is a high cost to identifying oneself as a Christian, and only those who are all-in deserve the name. But the good news is that we receive the grace to do exactly that, if we surrender ourselves completely to it, to allow God to work on us, perfect us, and unite us to the incredible heavenly beauty and joy of his own divine life.

Our first reading expounds on the beauty of the heights of divine wisdom and truth we are called to center our life on, and the utter difficulty, or rather impossibility, of this without God. โ€œFor the deliberations of mortals are timid, and unsure are our plans. For the corruptible body burdens the soul and the earthen shelter weighs down the mind that has many concerns. And scarcely do we guess the things on earth, and what is within our grasp we find with difficulty; but when things are in heaven, who can search them out? Or who ever knew your counsel, except you had given wisdom and sent your holy spirit from on high?โ€

Again, not that our physical nature is evil, but it distracts us from what is most important. Our bodies are good. God gave us our bodies. And Jesus even united himself to our bodily nature to restore the goodness of our human nature, which is body and soul as a unity of a human person. Fr. Robert Spitzer wrote a beautiful book called, โ€œFinding True Happiness,โ€ which, among other things, outlines four levels of happiness we pursue and enjoy, from the lowest and most immediate gratification that flees as soon as the act is completed, to the highest and most abstract levels of happiness, which give us an enduring, fulfilling happiness. But to attain the higher, more spiritual levels, we often have to say โ€œnoโ€ to the lower, more physical levels.


Our psalm today has the beautiful line, โ€œTeach us to number our days aright, that we may gain wisdom of heart.โ€ When we contemplate the reality that we have a limited amount of time to become what we will be forever, either holy or hell-bound, it should inspire us to always be moving upward. Blessed Carlo Acutis, a young person who is being canonized as a saint this weekend by Pope Leo XIV, said, โ€œI die serene because I have not wasted even a minute of my life in things God does not like.โ€ He had a great devotion to young saints, and now he is one of them.

And lastly, our second reading from one of the shortest books in the bible, Saint Paulโ€™s letter to Philemon. It is one of the letters written by Paul while in prison. And in prison, Paul meets and converts a man named Onesimus, who was a slave who fled from his master Philemon, who Paul knows, as he was a prominent Christian in the community of the Colossians. And so Paul is writing to Philemon not only to tell him, โ€œHey, I just found your escaped slave,โ€ but also, โ€œHey, Iโ€™m sending your escaped slave back to you as a member of the church, a brother in Christ, who is dear to my heart, so treat him as you would treat me.โ€ Obviously, this is going to make for an awkward reunion. Ordinarily, Onesimus would be flogged and branded. But Paul is reminding Philemon that our spiritual relationships, such as brothers and sisters in the family of Christ, as children of God our Father, take a higher place than our relationships in the flesh. Also, note that Paul says, โ€œI appeal to you for my child, Onesimus, whose father I have becomeโ€ฆโ€ for those who condemn Catholics for calling priests their spiritual โ€œfather.โ€

And so again, to end with this example from Saint Paul, we must put the high demand, even sacrificial demand, of the Christian faith, first in our lives, the solid rock foundation of our lives. We must be Christian first, and everything else we are, we do, and we have in our lives is to serve, witness, and reinforce our Chrisitan identity, over all the things of this fallen world, and our temporary existence as part of it. We are called to be in the world, but not of the world, witnessing to the world by the faith, hope, and love of our Christian life.

Homily: Humility and Children (and Minneapolis)

22nd Sunday of Ordinary Time (Year C) (go to readings)
Sirach 3:17-18, 20, 28-29
Psalm 68:4-5, 6-7, 10-11
Hebrews 12:18-19, 22-24a
Luke 14:1, 7-14


Christian Herter was the governor ofย Massachusetts, andย later the Secretary of State. While he was governor of Massachusetts, he was running hard for a second term. One day, after a busy morning without lunch, he arrived at a church barbecue. It was late afternoon and Herter was famished. As he moved down the serving line, he held out his plate to the woman serving chicken. She put a piece on his plate and turned to the next person in line.ย โ€œโ€˜Excuse me,โ€ย Governor Herter said,ย โ€œdo you mind if I have another piece of chicken?โ€ โ€œโ€˜Sorry,โ€ย the woman told him.ย โ€œIโ€™m supposed to give one piece of chicken to each person, because youโ€™re going to get other items further down the line.โ€ย โ€œโ€˜But Iโ€™m starved, and I love chicken,โ€ย the governor said.ย โ€œโ€˜Sorry,โ€ย the woman said again. โ€œOnly one to a customer.โ€ Governor Herter was a modest and unassuming man, but he decided that this time he would throw a little weight around.ย โ€œโ€˜Do you know who I am?โ€ย he said.ย โ€œI am the governor of this state!โ€ โ€œโ€˜Do you know who I am?โ€ย the woman retorted.ย โ€œIโ€™m the lady in charge of the chicken. Move along, mister.โ€ย ย 

Clearly the theme shared by readings this weekend is humility. We have sort of a love-hate relationship with humility, in that we can simultaneously think weโ€™re the worst person in the room and look down on everyone else as better than them, at the same time. Humility comes from the Latin word for ground, or dirt. A humble person is grounded in reality, their feet on the ground, and living with their mind in the real world. That doesnโ€™t mean without faith in the invisible and supernatural and holy, but not in a fantasy world that isnโ€™t real. God is truth, and so we can only encounter God if weโ€™re also accepting and living the truth, about ourselves, about the world, and about God.

Humility doesnโ€™t mean trying to make ourselves small. Mother Teresa says, โ€œTrue humility is truth. Humility comes when I stand as tall as I can, and look at all my strengths, and the reality about me, and then put myself alongside Jesus Christ. And itโ€™s there, when I see how my greatness is so little in the light of his greatness, and I stop being fooled about myself and impressed with myself, that I begin to learn humility.โ€

In our gospel reading Jesus gives two separate messages about humility. First, he speaks to invited guests at a banquet. He sees that theyโ€™re taking the best seats, trying to cultivate powerful friendships and influence, presuming upon their reputation to take places of honor. But Jesus admonishes them not to be presumptuous, which incurs the risk of being humiliated by being sent downward in the social ladder. Rather, Jesus says, presume the lowest place as your proper place, not with a false humility of expecting to be moved higher, but a true humility. If you can be genuinely happy in the lower place, you will be even more happy when you are given a higher place, not because you believe you deserve it, but because you believe you donโ€™t, and you appreciate the gift of your hostโ€™s esteem.

And then Jesus gives a second message to the hosts of such celebrations: donโ€™t just invite those who will just return the favor, but also invite those who cannot, those who are the weak, powerless, poor, and outcast in society, that your celebration would truly be virtuous and generous. And of course, you would be their host, like Martha, waiting on them, and in that you would truly learn humility. Whoever wishes to be great must be the servant of all, Jesus says elsewhere.

Remember from the beginning of the gospel reading that this is at the house of a pharisee, on a Sabbath. So, while they should be praising the Lord, theyโ€™re praising themselves and each other. And while they should be good and caring shepherds, theyโ€™ve allowed themselves to get disconnected from the sheep and think theyโ€™re better than them. But Jesus is trying to restore that connection, that order of communion, and that virtue, in the hearts and ministry of the pharisees. The pharisees are a well-respected religious group that tried to take the prescriptions in the law for the priests, and apply them to everyone, in the effort to set Israel apart as a kingdom of priests, a holy people set apart, and thus to restore Israel to its greatness. But this would also tempt them to take pride in their attentiveness to legalistic details, and miss the greater call of the weightier things of the law, such as mercy and the humility to walk with the weak and vulnerable.


So to use that as something of a segue, speaking of the beloved children of our heavenly father, I want to clarify something. I had said at one of the Masses a few weeks ago that I, like many of us, are joyful and appreciative of the little interpolations and contributions to our celebration of the least among us, the babies and toddlers who enjoy exploring the acoustics of their little voices in our church. Sometimes people complain that there arenโ€™t any children, then people complain that the noise of children is an obstacle to hearing whatโ€™s being said. I think part of the solution has been worked out as it seems our sound system has been successfully adjusted to make it easier to hear. And in my humility, in which I invite you to join with me, Iโ€™m going to say that I would rather have the sound of children drowning out my voice, than to have you hear me easily because we have made families with children feel like they are unwelcome. Because I think itโ€™s far more important that we have a church of engaged young parents whose young children are unpredictable in their being young children, than to have a church that is dying because young families instead went where they were better welcomed, appreciated, and supported. So thatโ€™s a sacrifice I think we should offer to make as a parish community, because we, too, are called to be little ones in the kingdom, and perhaps itโ€™s a good constant reminder of what little ones are like. I will trust that the parents of our little ones will do their best, and I will trust that those around them will be welcoming and compassionate.

And unfortunately, speaking of children in church, we heard of the evil tragedy at Annunciation Catholic Church and School in Minneapolis this week, when a mentally ill person shot into the church during the all-school Mass, killing an 8 and a 10 year old, and injuring 17 others in the church, and then took their own life. More information is coming out about the situation, and a lot of things are being said in the media and social media. But one of the important things that is coming out is a frustration at the phrase, โ€œthoughts and prayers.โ€ I actually re-released a blog article I had written in 2018 after the Parkland, Florida school shooting on this phrase. Long story short: for those of us who have little connection to the incident, and little power to do anything else about the incident, we do certainly offer our thoughts and prayers to the school and parish families, to all school families, especially in Catholic school, whose anxiety level has been raised this week because of this incident. And as followers of Christ, who instructed us to pray for our enemies and our persecutors, we also pray for those who caused this tragedy. If they could not get the support they needed in this life, perhaps we can contribute to the support they may need in the next life. But for those who do have the power to do something more to prevent tragedies like this from happening again, politicians, statesmen, the medical community, and others, then their response has to go beyond โ€œthoughts and prayers.โ€ This isnโ€™t a substitute for a real corrective response. Some prominent people have ridiculed or denied the importance or effectiveness of prayer in the wake of this tragedy. And to be fair, it is not just a denial of faith and the powerful love of God, but more basically it is a response of frustration at those who have the power to effect change to potentially prevent these kinds of tragedies, but instead just offer โ€œthoughts and prayersโ€ instead of the work that they can do and are obligated to do.

In our parish here, a thousand miles away from our spiritual brothers and sisters at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, we do heavily and sadly unite our hearts with their broken hearts, their grieving hearts, in their parish family. That same day, Wednesday, our parish was hosting a silver rose, a ย program of the Knights of Columbus of Canada, the United States, and Mexico, under the patronage of Our Lady of Guadalupe, to commend the lives of all children, particularly those in the womb, to the protection of Our Lady. After our Mass the silver rose was processed over to Saint Maryโ€™s. There are 8 silver roses, which started in various places in Canada, Hawaii, Florida, and the Caribbean, and their pilgrimage journeys will unite at the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe on her feast day, December 12. So I thank our Knights of Columbus for this and the many things you do to promote the pro-life message of Catholic Church teaching.

And I mentioned at that Wednesday Mass that perhaps we can use this tragedy to add some important devotion into our recitation of the prayer for the help of Saint Michael, the prayer written by Pope Saint Leo XIII after a mystical vision of the Church under demonic attack, and the call for protection by the archangel Saint Michael, the protector of Godโ€™s people. As Pope Leo had required the prayer to be said after all Masses until it was discontinued after the Second Vatican Council, many bishops, including Bishop Gainer, again required it in all the parishes of the diocese since 2016. So, this prayer at the end of Mass is not an opportunity to go out to the parking lot ahead of the crowd, itโ€™s a requirement for each of us to pray for the spiritual defense of the Church, and her members, from the deadly enemy.

The world is indeed a beautiful place. God created it and called it very good, especially his final creation, humanity. Yes, there are evils in the world, evil spirits, perhaps evil people, evil groups of people, evil inventions, evil use of things. But we know that evil does not win in the end. God wins, and his people win with him. Let us rejoice in him, and, with humility, trust in him, and follow him.

Homily: Praise the LORD, all you nations

21st Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year C (go to readings)


We know from rabbinic sources from around the time of Jesus that one of the big questions they were wrestling with was, โ€œwho will be saved?โ€ You hear it a number of times in the New Testament, including in our Gospel reading today. Rabbis leaning toward the conservative side were saying that not all of Israel would be saved. The generation of Noah, the people of Sodom, the rebellious generation that left Egypt in the Exodus, the ten lost tribes of the Northern Kingdom. They were excluded. Other rabbis, leaning toward a more liberal interpretation, were saying that God would restore the lost tribes, and perhaps show mercy to all who had sinned, and perhaps all of Israel might be saved. But on both sides, the scope of who would be saved was still limited to Israel, Godโ€™s chosen people. Even the more liberal suggestion was that being an Israelite, a Jew, was a guarantee of salvation. And so, with this question circulating around Israel, someone finally asks the Messiah, the one who perhaps would know for sure, this burning question. And Jesus, being typical Jesus, doesnโ€™t answer the question. In fact, he answers a whole different question, which wasnโ€™t asked. In response to this one personโ€™s question, he said to the crowd, โ€œStrive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough.โ€ So a few things in that important sentence: First, the narrow gate seems to favor the narrow interpretation of the question that was asked. Second, we might picture a crowd trying to get through a pass that narrows down to one person at a time. Like an amusement park gate or sports venue gate. The entrance seems wide, but as you get close, you see it’s rather narrow and guarded. And if there were a big rush trying to pass through that narrow gate, the strong would seem to have an advantage. But for this gate, itโ€™s not the physically strong, but the spiritually strong. Those who have disciplined themselves and their appetites to be virtuous, because they have battled against their vices in prayer and surrender to God to grow in holiness. These are the ones who will be strong enough to pass through this gate. And third and most important about this, is that Jesus doesnโ€™t answer the question of whether there will be few or many, but rather the instruction to make sure that no matter how many there are, you make sure that you are among them. Your call is not to be holier than the next person, but to be as holy as you can possibly be.

โ€œYou stand outside knocking and saying, ‘Lord, open the door for us.’ He will say to you in reply, ‘I do not know where you are from. And you will say, ‘We ate and drank in your company, and you taught in our streets.’ Then he will say to you, ‘I do not know where you are from. Depart from me, all you evildoers!‘โ€

Thereโ€™s a difference between “knowing about Jesus” and “knowing Jesus.” When Pope Leo XIV was elected, a lot of people got to know a lot about him. But not like his family knows him. Itโ€™s not enough to know about Jesus, to hear the bible stories, to say daily prayers, go to Mass, even receive communion, and be done with it until next time. We have to intentionally enter into spiritual communion with Jesus, give him permission to change our hearts, our lives, and then prayerfully respond to his invitation to these changes heโ€™s leading us through, becoming closer to him, conforming our heart to his sacred heart, hearing his voice and obeying in love.

God makes each of us with great care. He is our heavenly father. But we can make ourselves into something else, we can distort ourselves, distort our humanity, our goodness, by sin, by rejection of Godโ€™s discipline, and then fearfully hear God say, โ€œI do not know you. I do not know where you are fromโ€ as the gates of heaven are locked against us, and we are outside wailing in eternal sorrow, or even eternal anger, railing against God for having the audacity to exclude us.

It can apply to us in the church as much as it applied to the Jews hearing Jesus say, โ€œwhen you see Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God and you yourselves cast out. And people will come from the east and the west and from the north and the south and will recline at table in the kingdom of God.โ€ Jesus doubles down on that personal message: not just saying directly, โ€œStrive to enter through the narrow gate,โ€ but โ€œyou yourselves cast out.โ€ The Greek word for strive there is โ€œagonizomai,โ€ where we get the word โ€œagonyโ€ and โ€œagonize,โ€ which also appears in Paulโ€™s first letter to the Corinthians, when he is talking about athletes exercising discipline, โ€œagonizomaiโ€, struggling, striving, with all their might, their mind, their heart, for their little reward, and how much more should we strive for salvation, which we could lose by vice, sin, and distraction?

Weโ€™re going to end with the last part of that quote: โ€œAnd people will come from the east and the west and from the north and the south and will recline at table in the kingdom of God.โ€ In this, Jesus is confirming Old Testament passages like our first reading in which Israel will be restored not for its own sake, but for the sake of the whole world. The Jews were angry with Jesus for being a Messiah that claimed to be not just Israelโ€™s own private savior from the oppression of the Romans, but the universal savior of humanity from the oppression of sin. I love irony, but sometimes irony can be dark. Just as Eve in the Garden of Eden fell to the serpentโ€™s lie that eating the fruit would make her like God, when she was already more like God than she would be after eating the fruit, the Jews were unhappy with Jesus, as we just said, but it was in being the Messiah, the Savior of the World, by which he would restore Israel to its special privileged place of being Godโ€™s holy city. And because of their angry rejection of Jesus, they crucified him just outside of Jerusalem, and fulfilled what Jesus had promised, the Messianic Age, but now in a way in which the Jewsโ€™ relationship to this fulfillment is difficult, and the city of the glory of the New Covenant people, the Church, is no longer Jerusalem, which was destroyed, as Jesus said would happen if they killed him. โ€œIf you destroy this temple, I will rebuild it in three days.โ€

But weโ€™re going to sum all this up to two points Jesus gives us. First, we should focus more on our personal commitment to striving for our personal holiness without the distraction of asking if it will be many or few, or comparing ourselves to other people. There are places in the scriptures where it seems like a few, such as our gospel reading, and there are places where it seems like many, such as the numberless multitude in the book of Revelation.

Our faith teaches us that God has given humanity through the Catholic Church all the necessary means of salvation, which is to say the Sacred Scriptures, sacred Tradition, sacred Liturgy, and sacred sacraments, particularly the grace which protects the integrity of the Church and its Faith. The downside for us of course is not only are we more under attack by the enemy who wants to destroy the Church and its members, but that we are held to a higher standard. “To whom much is given, of them much is expected.” As Israel should have been the beacon of holiness to the ancient world, guided by the gift of the divine law, the Church ought to be even more so to the modern world, guided by the grace and truth of the New Covenant.

The Catholic Church teaches that although God instructs us about what is necessary for salvation, and we must take that with absolute seriousness, God himself is not limited to what he has given us. He is God, and he can freely choose to save whom he wills, how he wills, but he willed to reveal to us the way he intended to save us, and so we would be wise to obey, and foolish to be presumptuous.

Those who were raised outside the faith or with an immature faith will be judged less harshly, as we heard a few weekends ago. To the extent that they do good and avoid evil as they perceive it in their fallen and limited human nature, the good that they do outside the state of grace will not be salvific, but will help conform them and open them up more to goodness, and help them to more easily hear the call of God in them toward Jesus and his Church. However, even though whatever evil they choose is in greater ignorance, while their sinfulness is not as grave, they still must suffer the consequences of the evil of their actions. While those outside the Church have a hope of salvation by the mystery of Godโ€™s mercy beyond what he has instructed for the Church, it is still a great act of love to evangelize lost souls, because not only does it help them avoid sin and the consequences of evil choices, but more importantly it invites them to the joy of the life of grace, the beauty of the Church temporally and spiritually, the spiritual blessings of the sacraments, and the fuller blossoming of their particular gifts. While many consider the Catholic Church to be their enemy, the Church does not consider them to be her enemy. They are her lost children, her mission field, and those yet to be reborn to her in the womb of baptism and brought into full communion in her spousal relationship with the Lord.

Jesus was and is the Messiah, sent to restore Israel, including the expectation of reuniting the ten lost tribes who had been dispersed among the nations of the world. And so, if the Messianic covenant is going to include the descendants in all the world, then all the world, those who are outside the covenant, must be invited. And so, after Pentecost until the end of the age, in the gift of the Holy Spirit, Jesus sends out his Apostles to north, south, east, and west, inviting all to enter into the New Covenant: responding to grace by living the life of love, faith, and obedience, striving for holiness as God has revealed it to us, including sharing the fullness of truth we have received. Although God loves all and calls all to accept the invitation, not all will humbly submit themselves to his discipline and formation, to be able to answer the call to the banquet. His love is unconditional, and our response is up to us. We can be those warned about being shut out. Or we can be the beneficiaries of our readings today: the ones invited from all the nations, north, south, east, and west. Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb.

Homily: The Assumption of Mary, our Co-Redemptrix

Solemnity of the Assumption of the BVM
Vigil Readings: Go to readings

1 Chronicles 15:3-4, 15-16; 16:1-2
Psalm 132:6-7, 9-10, 13-14
1 Corinthians 15:54b-57
Luke 11:27-28
Feast Day Readings: Go to readings
Revelation 11:19A; 12:1-6A, 10AB
Psalm 45:10, 11, 12, 16
1 Corinthians 15:20-27
Luke 1:39-56


The Wisdom literature of the Bible says, โ€œA three-ply cord is not easily brokenโ€ (Eccl 4:12). So, we are going to braid together three cords: the readings for the Vigil and for the Feast of the Assumption, and a timely article that just came out about Pope Leo XIVโ€™s Marian devotion as displayed in his first 100 days as pope. The article is an interview with Dr. Mark Miravalle, a Catholic professor, on the topic of the Blessed Motherโ€™s beautiful title as โ€œCo-Redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces, and Advocate for humanity.โ€

Pope Leo was elected on a Marian Feast Day, the Feast of Our Lady of Pompeii. Many popes across the centuries have prayed at this Marian shrine in Italy. It was from Pompeii that popular devotion began the call for the dogma of the Assumption. Our Lady of Pompeii is associated with the story of Blessed Bartolo Longo, a 20th century satanic priest who converted to the Catholic faith, became a Dominican tertiary, and had a deep, authentic devotion to Mary and the rosary. He became a friend of Pope Leo XIII (the first pope to approve the title for Mary as โ€œcoredemptrixโ€), and it was from Blessed Bartoloโ€™s writings that Pope John Paul II developed the Luminous Mysteries of the Rosary. This feast of Our Lady of Pompeii, May 8, was previously the feast of Mary the Mediatrix of All Graces. So already just on day one, a lot of Marian connections for Pope Leo. He has not hesitated to make reference to Our Lady in the first moments of his papacy, calling us to pray with her, identifying her as our mother. It is his habit as pope to go to the basilica of Saint Mary Major to see the revered Byzantine icon Our Lady ofย Salus Populi Romani, held by Tradition to have been painted by the evangelist Saint Luke. His coat of arms has at the top of it the Fleur-de-lis, a heraldic symbol associated with Mary.


One of the difficulties between Catholics and Protestants regarding the Catholic devotion to Mary is that while the New Testament gives a few clues to Maryโ€™s importance to the life and faith of Christians and the Church, the real revelation of Maryโ€™s special importance lies in the Old Testament images she fulfills.

One of the best examples is the Marian title โ€œThe Ark of the New Covenant,โ€ which we can see with first reading from the vigil with the first reading from the Feast Day, along with parts of the gospel reading from the Feast Day. The ark had been lost in battle and found, and King David was bringing it to Jerusalem. However, after a tragic accident, they postponed the procession, temporarily storing the ark in the home of Obed-edom whose home in the Judean hill country was blessed for the three months it stayed there. Then resuming the procession, David danced and shouted with joy before the Ark of the Lord as it was triumphantly enthroned in the sanctuary. David cried out, “Who am I, that the Ark of the Lord should come to me?” Remember the contents of the ark: it the staff of Aaron, a royal symbol of Godโ€™s power, a jar of mana, the bread of heaven, the answer to Mosesโ€™ priestly prayer on behalf of the people in the wilderness, and the broken tablets of the ten commandments, the prophetic word of God to guide his people in wisdom and righteousness (symbols of priest, prophet, and king). The ark was crowned with the mercy seat, on which the glory cloud of the Lord would overshadow and rest, the presence of the Lord with his people. We also see references to this in our psalm for this feast, โ€œLord, go up to the place of your rest, you and the ark of your holinessโ€ฆ Let us enter his dwelling, let us worship at his footstool.โ€ The ark was lost again at the time of the Babylonian Exile and has never been found, and so the anticipation of the return of the ark was part of the hope of the Messianic fulfillment.

Putting that together with the gospel reading for the feast day, Mary had been, like the ark, overshadowed by the glory cloud, the Holy Spirit, and became the vessel of the Messiah, the Son of God, priest, prophet, and king, the presence of God amidst his people. When Elizabeth heard Maryโ€™s voice, John the Baptist leapt in her womb, and Elizabeth shouted with joy, and said, “Who am I, that the Mother of my Lord should come to me” as David had leapt and shouted joyfully in the presence of the Ark. And their house, like that of Obed-edom, in the hill country of Judea, was blessed for the three months Mary was with them.

We see the ark again in the reading from the Book of Revelation of St. John, where he sees the Ark in the heavenly temple, and then goes on to describe this vision, โ€œa woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. She was with childโ€ฆ She gave birth to a son, a male child, destined to rule all the nationsโ€ฆโ€ John doesnโ€™t change subjects, hereโ€”heโ€™s saying that the ark is the woman with the crown of twelve stars. The figure of the ark has at last appeared again, in its fulfillment in Mary. Now weโ€™re getting closer to our feast day.

Another helpful Old Testament connection is in the psalm for the feast day, โ€œThe queen stands at your right hand, arrayed in gold.โ€ In the Kingdom of David, the queen wasnโ€™t the kingโ€™s wife, he had many wives. The queen was the kingโ€™s mother. And she would sit at the right hand of the king, receiving the requests of the people and interceding on their behalf with her son, the king. So with Jesus being the new โ€œSon of Davidโ€, whose kingdom will have no end, who would be the queen in this kingdom, but Mary, the kingโ€™s queen mother, who is a mother to all the children of the kingdom, and intercedes with her son on their behalf.


Now, the mystery of the Assumption is a fruit of the mystery of the Immaculate Conception. And the Immaculate Conception is a fruit of the mystery of the Annunciation. When the angel greeted Mary, he used a word in Greek that appears nowhere else: kecharitomฤ“nฤ“ (ฮบฮตฯ‡ฮฑฯฮนฯ„ฯ‰ฮผฮญฮฝฮท). It refers to something, a person, whose very nature of existence is the act of receiving (being filled with) grace, and of course the definition of grace is โ€œthe life of God within us.โ€ This word, kecharitomฤ“nฤ“, means more than โ€œfull of grace.โ€ It is spoken only about this one special person, and the word is so special that the one time it is used it is said by an angel. So thereโ€™s something about Mary. Not only is she going to be the one to receive the life of God within her in the mystery of the Incarnation, but her whole life is a sinless response to this annunciation, as her whole life up to this moment has been a sinless preparation for it. God will receive his humanity from her (thus making her truly mother of God incarnate, Jesus), and she will have the role as queen intercessor of her people, as she showed at the Wedding Feast of Cana (Jn 2:2-11). This maternal care of Mary for the Church is further evidenced at the cross, as Jesus commends Mary, the woman, the mother, to John, the blessed disciple whom Jesus loved, which by extension is all of us.

Our gospel reading for the vigil has a woman calling out of the crowd to Jesus, โ€œBlessed is the womb that carried you and the breasts at which you nursed.โ€ He replied, โ€œRather, blessed are those who hear the word of God and observe it.โ€ Some will say that this is Jesus distancing himself from Mary. But no one has heard the word of God and observed it better, with more purity of heart, than Mary. So indeed, blessed is the woman whose womb carried him, but not because of the physical bond of motherhood, but because of her spiritual role of motherhood and her spiritual role as the first and greatest disciple, the immaculately conceived, preserved, and protected vessel of grace. Mary herself confirms the immaculate conception when, 4 years after Pope Pius IX declares it as one of the Marian dogmas of the Christian faith in 1854, Mary says to Saint Bernadette at Lourdes, โ€œI am the Immaculate Conception.โ€

But that begs the question, if Mary is the Immaculate Conception, perpetually without sin, did she suffer death, which is the consequence of sin? Adam and Eve, as the original parents of all humanity, introduced sin into humanity and propagated it to all their descendants. One of the titles of Mary is โ€œThe New Eve,โ€ whose children live not unto death, but by the paschal mystery of the New Adam, who redeems and recreates humanity, live unto eternal life. Theย June 9th homilyย by Pope Leo, one of the clearest references to Our Ladyโ€™s co-redemption, says that Maryโ€™s motherhood took an unimaginable leap to the cross where she becomes the new Eve and that Jesus has associated her in hisย redemptive death. Thatโ€™s what the title co-redemptrix means: that Mary uniquely participates with Jesus, the new Eve with the new Adam, in the redemption of humanity. But the fact that Pope Leo brought the new Eve to Calvary is very significant.ย Jesus, who won infinite grace for our redemption, defers to the Blessed Mother in the distribution of those graces according to her maternal care of the children of God. She who loved with a perfect sinless heart could perfectly join herself in love to the sufferings of others, most especially her son, and then also all those who humbly call upon her intercession.


And so, we have our second reading from the feast day, Paulโ€™s first letter to the Corinthians, quoting the prophet Hosea: โ€œDeath is swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?โ€ And Paul continues, โ€œThe sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.โ€

Mary perfectly lived the law, was not stung by sin, and so would not suffer death as a consequence. The Church carefully worded the dogma of the Assumption to not clearly resolve this question of whether Mary died. The definition of the dogma says, โ€œthat the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.โ€ Jesus, by his divine nature, ascended to heaven by his own power. Mary, in her human nature, like ours, does not have that power, and was assumed into heaven by the power of God. There is a legend that Mary seemed to die, what the Eastern Church calls the mystery of the Dormition of Mary, and all the apostles buried her, except Thomas, who was working in India. When Thomas arrived, they re-opened the tomb and it was empty. Hence the seed planted in the apostolic tradition, nursed and developed over the centuries, until it was proclaimed by Pope Pius XII in 1950, not as something new, but as something whose time had come. In the face of the many modern human attempts that came after World War II and the rise of atheistic humanism to redefine humanity and our perfection, the Church puts forth in the Assumption the truth that God has defined the nature of humanity, and in God is the only real perfection of humanity; and the humble, prayerful, obedient Blessed Virgin Mary is the perfect image and example of how God exalts the soul that trusts in him, that he lifts up the lowly and glorifies the humble forever in eternal life.

Pope Leo XIV revealed his papal name to be a call-back to Leo XIII, who not only had a great Marian devotion, as we said earlier, but also a mission to protect the understanding of genuine human dignity in a time of global tension and injustice, just as Pope Pius responded to similar tensions in 1950, and also as Pope Leo XIV has in our time, against global tensions, injustice, and the potentially anti-humanistic threats latent in artificial intelligence: that he might safeguard what it means to be authentically human in an increasingly digital, virtual, and artificial world, but also to protect against a kind of digital idolatry, as people turn to AI to ask the profound questions of meaning, truth, good, and love, for which they should properly turn to God with prayer and dialogue, not to AI with a command prompt. Pope Leo gave a message to 50,000 young peopleย at a youth festival in Rome, and said to them: โ€œNo algorithm can ever substitute an embrace, a glance, a true encounter, neither with God, nor our friends, nor our family. Think of Mary.โ€ I think it revealed, in the mind of the Pope, that Our Lady has that ability of bringing back what is authentically human.

The truth of the importance of Mary is like Saint Augustineโ€™s quote about scripture: the new is hidden in the old, and the old is revealed in the new. As we look at the mystery of the Blessed Mother, we are assured that our personal human nature was intentionally and personally designed with our body and soul, which is destined with meaning and for perfection. Mary as co-redemptrix is her privilege to participate in distributing the graces won by her son in his Paschal Mystery, as she was so painfully united to him in his suffering. He is the one mediator between God and humanity, but he generously shares the joy of distributing this grace, for those who call upon him in faith, especially through the intercession of the Blessed Mother, who for her humble faith and obedience in her special role in salvation history, was assumed body and soul into heaven, the sign of Godโ€™s promise of the fulfillment of our humanity and our eternal life. ย 

Homily: SUDS

Homily for the 19th Sunday of Ordinary Time, Year C (go to readings)
Wisdom 18:6-9
Psalm 33:1, 12, 18-19, 20-22
Hebrews 11:1-2, 8-19
Luke 12:32-48


Something that came across my social media feed this past week was an article called, โ€œPrinciples of Neuroscience Embedded in the Spirituality of St. Francis de Sales – A Pastoral Approach to Addictive Behaviors.โ€ This is the kind of thing some of us priests read for fun. But one of the concepts new to me brought up in the article was the acronym, โ€œSUDโ€s, which stands for โ€œSeemingly Unimportant Decisionsโ€ Examples might include a recovering alcoholic joining co-workers after-hours, and finding out their plan is to meet at a local bar, and still agreeing to go with them. Or taking a detour that goes past the home of someone with whom one committed adultery. Or spending time with an old friend who is a catalyst for risky, dangerous behaviors. Saint Francis de Sales might call all of these โ€œoccasions of sin.โ€ Not sinful in themselves, but they present threats to sinful or dangerous behavior.

The idea of SUDโ€™s in my mind, as I was also thinking about our weekendโ€™s readings, is that seemingly unimportant decisions might be applied in the other direction, too. Seemingly unimportant decisions of virtue. Holding the door for the person behind you. Paying for the person after you at a store. Stopping to help someone fix a flat tire.

Our Lord speaks often about mercy: โ€œForgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.โ€ โ€œBlessed are the merciful, for they will receive mercy.โ€ The parable of the Good Samaritan. Why? Because the Lord wants to show us mercy, and he does show us mercy, but we can be unperceiving of it, not seeing, not being aware of it. How do we fix that? We have to attune our heart to the virtue of mercy. To Godโ€™s radio frequency. We can be on the wrong channel, listening to themes of revenge, pride, and anger. And weโ€™re missing the important broadcast. We have to change the dial, turn to the channel that Godโ€™s message is going out on. And to hear Godโ€™s message of mercy, we have to change the frequency of our heart to the channel of mercy. We have to sensitize ourselves to the theme of mercy. And we do that by showing mercy to others. The more we get into that groove of living a life of mercy; the more weโ€™re sensitized to opportunities of showing mercy, the more we will hear Godโ€™s message of how he is showing mercy to us. And, of course, even better, we will see more opportunities to show Godโ€™s mercy to others, and become his instrument of mercy. So sometimes these little SUDs, little seemingly unimportant decisions, can have big dividends in changing our heart little by little.

In the Old Testament reading, from the Book of Wisdom recalling the night of Passover, it says, โ€œFor in secret the holy children of the good were offering sacrifice and putting into effect with one accord the divine institution.โ€ And so by this decision, they had disposed themselves to be sensitive to hearing Godโ€™s voice, and they were ready to respond when he gave the command to pack up and flee Egypt.

In our psalm it says, โ€œSee, the eyes of the LORD are upon those who fear him, upon those who hope for his kindness, to deliver them from death and preserve them in spite of famine. Our soul waits for the LORD, who is our help and our shield.โ€ That listening closely for the voice of the Lord, hoping and trusting in the Lord, come what may, training the ear of faith to be attuned for that still small voice of the Lord among the loud voices around us, allows us to respond because we were ready. That image of our soul waiting for the Lord is not just one of being motionless, poised like runners on the starting blocks, but more like servants watching for the subtle gestures and signals of those they wait on, to be immediately responsive to the call to move.

Skipping over our second reading for a moment to go to the Gospel, Jesus is, as always, encouraging us to have that attentive yet active waiting on the Lord. If we practice that listening for the Lord, we can get a sense of what he is instructing us to do, not just in the word of the Scripture, but in the word of the Holy Spirit speaking to us in particular situations of our life.

There was a man who spent a month working at the House of the Dying in Calcutta with Mother Teresa. He said that on the first morning, she asked him, โ€œAnd what can I do for you?โ€ He asked her to pray for him. โ€œWhat do you want me to pray for?โ€ He voiced the request he most desired for his discernment in Godโ€™s plan for his life. He asked her, โ€œPray that I have clarity.โ€ She said โ€œNo.โ€ That was that. When he asked why, she answered that clarity was the last thing he was clinging to and had to let go of. When he commented that she herself had always seemed to have the clarity he longed for, she laughed: โ€œI never have had clarity; what Iโ€™ve always had is trust. So, I will pray that you have trust.โ€

Sometimes we can procrastinate following Godโ€™s will because we want more proof. We want a clearer instruction. We want the path marked out with lights and arrows. Believe me, I know, that was the story of my discernment for the priesthood. I was waiting for the divine 2’x4′ to remove any doubt of what I was supposed to do. But I came to understand I wasnโ€™t going to have that removal of all doubt. It was going to take faith and trust. And the more I walked that path, praying and listening intently, the stronger my faith and trust got, and the assurance came later.

God willing, a soul becomes so attuned and responsive to the smallest whisper of the Holy Spirit that the will of the soul becomes united to the will of God. In the highest level of the spiritual life, Saint John of the Cross describes it this way: โ€œThe tenderness and truth of love by which the immense Father favors and exalts this humble and loving soul reaches such a degreeโ€ฆ that the Father himself becomes subject to her for her exaltation, as though he were her servant and she his lord. And he is as solicitous in favoring her as he would be if he were her slave and she his god. So profound is the humility and sweetness of God.โ€ We see that in our gospel reading where Jesus says, โ€œBlessed are those servants whom the master finds vigilant on his arrival. Amen, I say to you, he will gird himself, have them recline at table, and proceed to wait on them.โ€ Of course, thatโ€™s exactly what Jesus did as he took the role of a humble slave and washed the feet of the disciples at the Last Supper. Saint John of the Cross also says of the beautiful soul, โ€œAs she stretches heroically toward God, her love and trust in God explodes in strength. Her longing for God is spiritually all-consuming. And her will is achingly obedient to his slightest prompting. Her works of mercy and charity are heroic by normal standards.โ€ This is the soul doing the Masterโ€™s will even when it feels he is absent. Those โ€œseemingly unimportant decisionsโ€ to dispose the soul to the voice of God become the habitual life and radiant joy of the virtuous soul, and help her to hear his voice even more clearly, and respond even more generously. Peter asks, โ€œLord, is this parable meant for us or for everyone?โ€ Jesus applies it universally. Everyone is called to be a steward of the spiritual, natural gifts they have received, the truth of the gospel they have received, and to share them generously in love as a participation in Godโ€™s generous unconditional love.

The end of the gospel reading I address in the bulletin column, but letโ€™s wrap up here by going back to the second reading. I saw a Christian T-shirt some time ago, and I was very tempted to buy it, because in big letters it just said, โ€œEven if.โ€ Some of you might immediately get that reference. Itโ€™s a call-back to the book of Daniel when the three young men were threatened with being burned in the white hot furnace for being faithful Israelites. They respond to the king, โ€œThere is no need for us to defend ourselves before you in this matter. If our God, whom we serve, can save usย from the white-hot furnace and from your hands, O king, may he save us! But EVEN IF he will not, you should know, O king, that we will not serve your god or worship the golden statue which you set up.โ€ A few weeks ago I saw the next level of that, in a social media image, one of my favorites now, that says, โ€œFear says, โ€˜What if.โ€™ Faith says, โ€˜Even if.โ€™โ€ Also related to our reading is the great quote by Saint Augustine, โ€œFaith is to believe in what cannot be seen, and the reward of faith is to see that in which you have believed.โ€ Saint Paul in our reading uses the beautiful example of the Old Testament mystics and prophetic figures who put their faith in God and were led through beautiful, sometimes excruciatingly difficult, acts of faith. They had listened to that voice that didnโ€™t always tell them what they wanted to hear, but told them what they needed to do. And responding to that, they grew into the person they were called to be. They looked for and longed for the fulfillment of the great covenantal promises of God, when God would be all in all, and the world would be full of his glory and love. But these promises were not fulfilled in their time.

Paul says, โ€œAll these died in faith. They did not receive what had been promised but saw it and greeted it from afar.โ€ They saw it through faith, and even if they didnโ€™t see it fulfilled in their own time, they had so grown in faith in God by being obedient to his voice that they knew by faith that God was working all things toward that fulfillment. We have that fulfillment now, through Christ, however we have it only veiled in faith and mystery, signs and sacraments, awaiting the beautiful manifestation of the divine plan, even if we donโ€™t see it in this life.

By our eager listening, waiting, and responding to the Word of God, and the whisper of the Holy Spirit within us, may we grow in our longing and love for him. May his will be done, through us, on earth as it is in heaven, through our “seemingly unimportant decisions,” which in faith are really our following the loving and beautiful will of God.